Clarance Thomas gives the Bonkers’ reason for Scotus to tear off settled laws

Justice Clarance Thomas is looking for more and more creative ways to justify the reorganization of long -term laws.

Rarely after the Catholic University Columbus Law School in Washington, a Judge appointed by George HW Bush said Thursday that the Supreme Court should take a more critical approach to a resolved precedent, stating that the decisions were not “gospel”, the ABC News said.

77 -year -old Thomas compared his Supreme Court colleagues with trains to passengers and said, “We never go forward to see who drives the train where he goes. And you can go there, in the engine compartment, find that it is an orangutan driving a train, but you want to follow that it’s just because it’s a train.”

He reasoned that some precedents were just “someone I had dreamed and others went together”.

“We have to think about what we do with Stare decisis at some point,” said Tom, stating the legal principle – to follow the precedent. “And this is not some kind of mascot agreement when you can just say ‘stare at the decision’ and don’t think, turn off the brain, right?”

Tom, the chief conservative of the court, submitted his power to catch comments a few days before the Supreme Court began.

Probably most, the court will consider whether to take challenges in the case Obergefell before Hodgeslandmark 2015 The decision to legalize same -sex marriages across the country.

The document also contains 1935. The opinion of President Donald Trump will often be able to resort to, public prayer football games and appeal against racing and redistribution, which, if abolished, would take the basic provisions of the Voting Rights Act.

Thomas also used strange metaphor for insults of his fellow court members to follow the precedent, the ABC said.

“I don’t think I have a gospel,” he added, “that any of these cases that have been decided is the gospel, and I greatly appreciate the precedent. But it should – it should – the precedent should worship our legal tradition, our country and our laws, and be based on something, not just something.

For a long time, Tom wanted to review some of the most important decisions of the Supreme Court, especially now that the court’s conservative majority of six to three.

However, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Judge John Robertso The New York Times;

To say that, precedents have to have Reviewed, often covered the most high level of questions and politically charged: abortions, positive actions and government regulation.

Those decisions also did not make the court a favorable light.

According to the Pew Research Center report, half of the Americans have an unfavorable view of the Supreme Court in almost historical lowlands.

Most of this is attributed to the court in 2022. To set aside the decision Roe before Wadewho established the constitutional right to abortion.

This story was updated to find out which press. Bush appointed Tom.

1