On the same day, the US began to charge China -owned and built ships in an additional dock in American ports, and China opened a probe into a 301 chapter study, which prompted taxes and sanctioned several Korean shipping giant segments with close American ties.
According to the Chinese Ministry of Transport, various government departments conduct a joint study on how the US probe affected the supply superpowering, shipbuilding and industrial supply chains.
More from the Sourcing Journal
“The relevant measures will be introduced on time, based on the results of the investigation,” says the Ministry of Transport.
The trade voltage between the US and China was the predominant theme of Trump’s administration, as since April. The rates are Tits-Tat. More recently, Spat has spilled export control through rare ground minerals.
However, the ongoing party trade negotiations were not the only one forward and forth. The days before the US levasted port taxes came into force, China avenged for its movement, knocking down US ships with similar taxes while leaving the door to open access boundaries in ports.
Tuesday’s probe extension, China has authorized five US subsidiaries to Hanwha Ocean, a South Korean shipbuilding company, officially banned companies to cope with China’s interests.
Sanctions for subsidiaries are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard Inc., Hanwha Ocean USA International LLC, Hanwha Shipping Holdings LLC and HS USA Holdings Corp, the China Ministry of Commerce report said.
China considers South Korea’s intermediate server in a trade conflict with the US, seeing the latter’s main US shipbuilding and military partner.
South Korea recently promised $ 150 billion to help revive the US dusting ship construction industry and fill its gap with China. The additional seeds were already planted last year, when Hanwha purchased a Philly shipyard for $ 5 billion to expand the annual production of shipyard from less than two ships to 20.
The Hanwha Ocean also secured contracts with the US Navy in 2024 to perform the US Navy maintenance, repair and overhaul.
Certainly, the competition for Chinese ships with South Korea plays an important role in sanctions. June Chinese ships make up 34.8 percent. The World Navy, just before South Korea, 30.9 %, according to Clarksons. The US accounts for only 0.4 percent.
The US trade representative (USR) opened a 301 chapter trade investigation in 2024. April, finding that China has “unreasonable” dominance throughout the logistics, maritime and shipbuilding sectors, which have hurt us to trade. Among the allegations, USRR found that China is using state subsidies to reduce competition and create addiction to the country’s non -market participants.
At that time, five US trade unions appealed to the service for investigation.
The American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA) critically evaluated US levivatized port dock taxes, calling for Trump’s administration to revise policy.
AAFA urged both countries to “retreat” from increasing taxes.
Although the trade group supported the goal of strengthening the construction of the domestic ships, it noted that the premium could not be achieved.
“Instead of reducing the construction of Chinese ships, carriers simply rearranged their fleets by deploying non-Chinese ships on US routes and further ordering orders on Chinese shipyards,” said Nate Herman, AAFA Executive Vice President. “China’s world market share in ship construction continues to grow, with an increase in June by over 65 % and by 84 % in August.
Herman noted that these shifts direct business from US ports and reduce the working capabilities of the American population.
“Instead of determining the criminal port taxes that create ineffectiveness and directing business from US ports, the focus should be on developing strong internal incentives and providing permanent support to revive American ship construction,” Audrey Clark, AAFA trade and transport specialist said in a statement. “Only by investing in the home can we strengthen competitiveness and secure our seas.”
Although the main carriers have essentially undertaken not to transfer any additional additional fees for users whose taxes are starting, April. Starting tax increases pose an additional risk that costs may be too high and start transferred to shippers.
According to AAFA, clothing and footwear companies can increase prices for consumers due to increasing transportation costs.
Although non -Chinese carriers worked on their schedules using ship sharing alliances, they are not entirely protected from them, maintaining the possibility that costs can be transferred. For example, the Alphaliner is expected to pay $ 510 million, according to 2026. USD taxes.
According to the data, it is expected that even regardless of COSCO delivery and foreign container lines (OOCL), the remaining 10 best container liners are expected to pay nearly $ 1.7 billion on dollars based on data.
