-
Elon Musk’s legal team He argues that the billionaire “does not use a computer” to reject the Open accused of having failed to comply with the discovery process in his claim for the company. The presentation is presented as part of the wider Musk’s legal struggle, accusing Open and Sam Altman for withdrawing from their profit -making roots.
Elon Musk’s lawyers said the billionaire “does not use a computer” after the Open has accused the musk for failure to follow the discovery process in his claim for the company.
In a letter to the Oakland Openai case, Jaimie Parkkin, a letter to Oakland’s Openai case, accused Openia’s false statements when the company claimed that the Musk’s legal team “did not intend to collect any documents” from Musk or Xai, his competing artificial intelligence.
In a letter, Parkkinen challenged this statement, saying that Musk’s lawyers informed “Open” that the search had been carried out on Musko’s mobile phone and that the billionaire did not use a computer.
“The plaintiffs sent a letter to the defendants informing the plaintiffs that Mr Musk’s mobile phone was searching for their e -mail and that Mr Musk did not use a computer,” the case reads.
There are some public evidence to suggest that musk really has a computer.
For example, only last month a billionaire X said: “I still use my vintage PC laptop with @doge sticker, which has long been made by a fan.” In a separate 2024. December In the post, Musk posted a computer image stating, “This is a photo of my laptop.” In the next February post, Musk announced, “I just bought a new computer laptop.”
Several x employees who spoke Wired In case of anonymity, it also stated that while musk usually prefers to work on his phone, they sometimes saw it using a laptop.
Musk’s representatives did not immediately respond to the request to comment Fate, Made in non -normal working hours.
Musk and Open
Submission is part of the permanent Musk case Sam Altman and Open.
Musk, the founder of Openai, accused his former colleagues who issued the company’s founding mission to create artificial intelligence for the sake of humanity. In a lawsuit filed in San Francisco, Musk said the Open had actually become a “closed code” by Microsoft’s hand, preferring profit, not for the public.
Musk’s claims against Openai include breach of contract, violation of fiduciary duty and unfair business practice. Its requirements are asked to return the company back to the open source and the order that Openai Execs could make profits from AGI.
The application states that the latest Openai model, GPT-4, can be considered artificial intelligence-and that its design remains secret about commercial interests.
“The inner GPT-4 details are known only to ‘Open’ and, given the information and beliefs, Microsoft. GPT-4 is the opposite of “open Ai”,-said Musk in the Nieškis. “And it is closed for the right commercial reasons: Microsoft means that the public failed to sell GPT-4, which would not be possible if Open, as needed, gives the public freely accessible technology.”
Musk, who has contributed more than $ 44 million for a non -profit organization, says his support has been twisted to serve a profit company, now worth $ 80 billion.
“Imagine that you are sacrificing a non-profit organization whose confirmed mission is to protect Amazon rainforest, but then a non-profit organization creates a profit for the Amazonian logging company that uses the fruit of the victims to clean the rainforest,” said Musk.
This story was initially displayed by fortuna.com