Everyone wondering if and when, the bubble will appear. That’s what declined 25 years ago to finally explode the dot-com boom

Comparison of today’s artificial intelligence and the Dot-Com bubble in the late 1990s became impossible to ignore. When AI, the company orders hundreds of billions – by 2025 alone. Dozens of new billionaires – and technology giants pour unprecedented amounts into data centers, investors and analysts ask a similar question: Do we observe how history is repeated?

Similarities are staggering. As with internet companies two decades ago, AI firms today attract huge investments based on transformational potential rather than current profitability. According to Stanford University research, Global Corporate Investment was $ 252.3 billion in 2024, The sector has grown thirteen times. Meanwhile, the largest American technology companies – Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft – were promised to spend a record $ 320 billion for this year, for AI infrastructure alone.

Even the Openai CEO Sam Altman, whose company is valued at about $ 500 billion, despite the fact that the ChatgPT started just two years ago, recognizes parallels. ‘

Are we at a stage where all investors are too much related to AI? My opinion is “yes,” said Altman in August. – Is it the most important thing to happen over a very long time? My opinion is also that way. ‘

But what really caused the Dot-Com Bubble in 2000. March And what lessons does he offer today AI boom? Let’s take a strip of memory or, if you haven’t born, a little simple ole story.

The Dot-Coma disaster was not caused by one event, and the rapprochement of the factors that revealed fundamental weaknesses in the technology economy at the end of the 1990s. The first critical blow came from the federal reserve, which several times increased interest rates during the 1999 and 2000. Federal funds increased from about 4.7% in 1999. At the beginning of up to 6.5% to 2000 In May, speculative investment was less attractive because investors could earn a higher return from safer bonds.

The second catalyst was a broader economic downturn that began in Japan in 2000. In March, the global market was fears and accelerating the flight from risky assets. This over -the -tariff and global uncertainty has forced investors to re -evaluate the astronomical assessments of Internet companies.

But the main problem arose much deeper: most Dot-com companies had essentially flawed business models. Commerce One has reached the value of $ 21 billion despite the minimum income. The Theglobe.com, founded by two Cornell students with a $ 15,000 Startup Capital, jumped 606% to $ 63.50 on the first day of the trade, despite the fact that they had no income exceeding risk financing. Pets.com burned $ 300 million within 268 days before declaring bankruptcy.

Leave a Comment