Hegseth and Rubio’s gloomy -recognized bomb “Intel” leakage is true

Two of Donald Trump’s best allies admitted that bomb leaks about Iran’s strikes were correct on Wednesday.

But then they attacked the release of an intelligence report, which abolished the president’s claims about US strike success in Iran’s nuclear facilities.

On Wednesday, the Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and the Secretary of State Marc Rubio organized an aggressive confrontation after a preliminary pantagon evaluation said the blasts were likely to be found only for a few months only for Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Trump stated that the strikes were “complete destruction”.

At a press conference, Hegset said the information was probably leaked for political purposes and said the FBI was conducting the issue.

“We are now conducting a leakage investigation with the FBI, as this information is for internal purposes – Battle for damage to the investigation – and CNN and others are trying to spin it to try to look bad when it was a huge success,” Hegset said.

“When you talk to people who built bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and those bombs can do, they landed exactly where they had,” Hegset continued. “And with the possibility of £ 30,000 and those ammunition, it was a devastation after Fordow.”

Over the weekend, the short allowed the strike in three Iranian nuclear sites-forgow, Natanz and Isfahan-, using £ 30,000 bunker-consteria bombs, which, according to Trump, devastated Iran’s nuclear program. However, reports of a secret evaluation of early intelligence indicate that the attacks are likely that the Iran nuclear program will only return a few months, not completely destroyed.

Daily Beast contacted the pentagon to comment.

“The Amount of Muniations -Six on Location -AnSessance That Tells You It It Was SATING OTHERWISE, IS Speculating With Other Motives, and We Know That, Because Wheen You Actially Look at the Report – Preliminary, IT WAS LOW-CONFIDENCE, SO YOU MAKE ASSESMENTS BASED ON What You Know, “Hegseth Said, Also Apparently Apparely Referring To The The New York Times The report coverage states that she said the damage was “moderate or heavy”.

He added that he believed the damage was more likely “serious and destroyed”, rejecting what he said was a “political motive” in a leak.

Rubis struck a more fighting tone, criticizing Leakers as “professional brakes”.

“About this intelligence information is what the berry tells you, says intelligence,” he said. “This is the game played by these people. They read it, then go out and describe it as they want.”

Rubio stated that “the conversion device” Iran would have to make a bomb “destroyed. He then acknowledged that” anything in the world can be rebuilt, “but said” now we know where it is, and if they try to rebuild it, we will also have opportunities. “

Hegseth and Rubio Diatribs appeared before leakage after they participated in a shameful leakage. They were both involved in a signal group conversation, which discussed sensitive information about the secret administration’s plans to strike goals in Yemen, without understanding that the journalist was also accidentally added to the group.

Meanwhile, the Trump admitted that the report was “correct”, but claimed that Iran’s nuclear plans had been returned “decades”. He also angrily erupted into Scum, which revealed the message.

“CNN is SCUM, MSDNC is SCUM, New York Times is scum. They are bad people, sick, ”shortly raging to reporters on Wednesday.

“What they did is that they tried to do this incredible victory to something less,” the short continued. “Generals and all the people who have done a good job, humiliate them with CNNs who can’t get ratings. The place dies, no one even wants to waste their time to go to their shows, so they form what shapes what creates something to shape [sic] The New York Timeswhich also dies. Without Trump you should not be a New York Times.‘