A new analysis of the Congress Budget Service says $ 3.2 million People would lose their food aid under tax and expenditure account, which was recently accepted by the US Representative House. (Lance Cheung/USDA Photo).
As a freelance writer, I had my financial and downturn. My own experience with poverty and paying accounts you really lack the funds you need to pay leaves me hidden for myopia for a huge budget package that has missed the US House of Representatives.
Republicans and Conservatives called it a “great beautiful expense,” but the new Mexico, The Food Depot, serving nine new Mexican county adults and people with disabilities in each state have access to the necessary food help. ‘
Local and national groups agree. And I believe in them.
These organizations indicate the obvious discrepancies of the draft law, revealing his intention not to raise the spirit or to introduce them to them, teaching and knowledge. It is to punish them.
The most talk about aspects are additional work requirements for nutritional aid and Medicaid recipients. There is a serious misunderstanding that poverty is layered, complex and full of traps during the amendments. Working snap recipients already meet the requirements of the job, as the exception to those who care for children or over 55 years old. The provisions of the US House Law abolish most exceptions, such as a clean slate that deletes all the differences or opportunities of the family. The new attitude that will make a major influence on the new Mexico, where 61% of the recipients of Snap are families with children – that is that every child with a child over six will have to meet the job requirements.
New requirements can easily damage home farms already in weak situations. Obviously, people with nutrition help have even fewer opportunities to pay for childcare. How much damage will the father leave home and systematically give up a very small child?
Also, if a family or lonely father faces the circumstances that cause they cannot meet the new job requirements, what will happen? The household loses its advantages. The point is that this means less food for a child. The proposal promises a drastic increase in children’s hunger. What society kidnaps food from families with children?
The account also set out the job requirements for Medicaid recipients, forcing them to prove that they are constantly working, which is essentially an excuse for additional documents – an additional bureaucracy in a system that is already clogged. The vast majority of Medicaid recipients are already working. After the 2023 Analysis found that 71% of Medicaid students studied or recruited at school, and a significant number of “unemployed” were some guardians who were at home due to sick family members. In addition, health care is a human right that should be accessible to all Americans, regardless of income or ability to make normal salary.
GOP House President Mike Johnson Cavalierly says the account is harmless. “What we are talking about again are working workers, many of whom refuse to work because they play the system,” he told Face the Nation on a television show and chose, “There is a moral component of what we do.”
Unfortunately, Johnson’s moral component is based on an obsessive ignition to be stereotypical for the recipients of help, that all people who are not financially soluble are lazy, helpless or criminal. Like the most distorted morality caused by independent groups, it is worsened by the refusal to examine the hypocrisy and self -analysis of the GOP itself. In the “big beautiful account” includes a huge tax reduction for the rich.
This means reducing services to bring benefits to very rich. One group should be thrown away from rolls to pay tax reduction, which strengthens another. The US Senate can do better than it, and should reject this “great beautiful law” and its contempt for elite morality.