The standard cosmology model can be the best explanation we have, why the universe is as it is and how it all came into being. But that’s not only Explanation.
Enter the Black Hole cosmology. It is a radical idea that a large explosion is a quick disassembly of an infinitely dense point, which is believed to have given birth to the space we know it – actually happened in a black hole that formed inside a larger “parent” universe.
ERGO, all of us – and every star, planet, galaxy and internet scar – lives in one of these mysterious distinctions.
Enrique Gazanaga, the main author a A new study Published in the magazine Physical review d and a professor at the University of Portsmut’s University of Cosmology and Gravity is ISNot the first to offer this controversial idea. However, his team research offers a new model how to imagine how this hypothetical scenario happened.
“Our calculations show that a big blast was not the beginning of everything, but rather the result of a gravitational crisis or collapse, which formed a very huge black hole – after it – bounce inside it,” Gazanaga wrote An essay for The conversation.
There are, of course, many holes that you could add to the standard model. Why is there more dealings than anti -att, when the universe should be the same? Why did the universe survive the period of “cosmic inflation” when it expanded faster than the speed of light, then stopped? And why Does today’s development level look different, depending on how we measure it?
It seems that the main gloom of gazanaga is our current understanding of exclusivity. For him, the idea of the universe that begins as an infinite density point is extremely dissatisfied.
“It’s not just a technical disadvantage; it’s a deep theoretical problem that shows that we really don’t understand the beginning,” he wrote.
Gazanaga also seeks other convenient cosmological structures, such as Dark Energy, which is intended to explain why the development of the universe is mysteriously accelerated. This hypothetical force is believed to make up 68 percent of the universe, but is completely unnoticeable, leaving space to question the existence of different thinking scientists.
By rethinking exclusivity, many of these confusion can be resolved neatly. We go back to the gazanaga paper.
“The gravitational collapse must not end in exclusivity,” he wrote The conversation; “Our mathematics shows that as the possible exclusivity approaches, the size of the universe changes as (hyperbolic) cosmic time function.”
This is a bold claim. The consensus is that the gravitational collapse – as a star in the black hole, must cause infinitely dense exclusivity. Gazanaga says that the collapse not only stops completely crushing the matter, but also changes the course – “bounce” in its terminology.
“What comes up on the other side of the bounce is the universe, extremely as our own,” explains Gazanaga. “It is even more surprising that the rebound naturally creates two separate phases of expedited expansion – inflation and dark energy, which is not due to hypothetical fields, but by bounce physics.”
This is a charming explanation, but it still needs to prove. It depends on some very well -established discount of physics. The standard model may not be perfect, but it is a standard for a reason. It will take much more to eliminate it, and Gazanaga is optimistic about the fact that future missions such as the European Space Agency Arkihs, which will look at the invisible Dark Matter structures to check the model, can reveal our answers.
More about cosmology: Astronomers were confused by learning that a group of nearby galaxies are pointing directly to us