For the second time a week, Shasta County woman Sherri Papini, convicted of fraud, and lied to the FBI for her forged abduction for 2016, tried to discuss her case privately with a court officer.
Papini’s lawyer met in a private palace on Wednesday with John Berglund, Commissioner of the High Court, Papini, a Papini, who claims to have stolen her boyfriend, on a temporary restraint order.
However, on Friday, Berglund denied a separate Papi request to meet privately when Papini is evicted from the Hingletown home owned by a former boyfriend. Papini represents the eviction case.
Sherri Papini leaves Shasta County Court Chamber in Redding, California after the hearing on Friday, 2025. June 6th
Papini gained global glory when 2016 November Disappeared before she left to run near her home north of eding. After 22 days, she appeared on the rural road Yolo County, beaten, branded and with her long, light hair.
At the time, she told law enforcement that she was kidnapped by two Spanish women who were physically harassing her.
Her story was distinguished by 2022. March, when the FBI was arrested by Papini, who confessed to misleading the kidnapping and committing his injuries. Later, she confessed to volunteering in Costa Mesa, California, with her ex -friend all the time.
That year, she admitted guilty of mail and lied to the FBI and was sentenced to 18 months in prison. It was obliged to repay the costs of approximately $ 309,000 to state, federal and local government for its costs.
In the new documents, he continues to be stated that she was kidnapped in 2016, but now she says the former guy was against his will. In a documentary, she says the story that 2016 November 2 She was kidnapped by two Spanish women, a lie made by the media.
Papini, a lawyer and a lawyer representing the woman who said she was watched, met with Berglund Palace on Wednesday. After the private hearing, the commissioner and two lawyers appeared, and Berglund announced that the case had been resolved and dismissed.
“For the sensitivity of the case”
Papini, who had no lawyer on Friday, tried to meet the commissioner again.
She filed a Berglund’s note saying, “On the sensitivity of the case,” she wanted to privately meet with the judge, not in an open court. The commission member denied the request and told her that Friday’s meeting was just a status conference and said none of the parties would agree on the merits of the case.
Sherri Papini leaves Shasta County Court Chamber in Redding, California after the hearing on Friday, 2025. June 6th
David Loy, the legal director of the first amendment, said it was not uncommon for settlement conferences, such as a temporary restraint case discussed on Wednesday, which will be discussed privately.
However, he said that meetings with the judge or court commissioner were only allowed in limited circumstances. Private meetings are usually not allowed simply because the case issues are sensitive.
“This alone is not enough. In other words, because it is dissatisfied or sensitive, that is not enough. And many court cases are shameful or sensitive.
Read more: Before Sherri Papini’s arrest, these were the main events of her “abduction” case
Elizabeth Elizond, a lawyer representing the property owner trying to evict Papini, said that a meeting with a private judge was unusual and that she had never met with a judge in the palace during her career.
“This is not normal. They never do it because of this type of hearing,” Elizond said in a letter.
Shawn Hibdon from Orlando is owned by the Shawni House of the Shawn. Papini says she agreed with her ex -boyfriend Hibdon to finally buy a house. However, they both ended their relationship and Hibdon sent a report in January that it had been evicted.
Hibdon uses eviction as an opportunity to shame it publicly, said Papini in a report presented in the eviction case.
“The plaintiff (Hibdon) was a threat to both implicit and clearly, if I do not buy home in specific, unfavorable conditions, I will be evicted, publicly humiliated or further harmed by my personal financial well-being,” she wrote in the declaration.
Hibdon representing Elizond stated that the statements were not true. Elizondo and Hibdon tried to resolve the dispute before he went to court and tried to avoid publicity with disagreement.
“In addition, we had to end the silence and announce the statement because the defendant’s side threatened to include the media if the agreement negotiations were not carried out under its terms.
“It seems that these actions are intended to publicly humiliate the plaintiff (Hibdon) – the very thing she accused of doing with her. We think it is important to recognize these threats that if no information is released, it can be viewed in the right context,” Elizond said.
Journalist Damon Arthur congratulates history tips by phone 530-338-8834, email By email to [email protected]. Help the local journalists to thrive today!
This article initially appeared in Redding Record Searchlight: Sherri Papini tries to take an eviction case behind closed doors