Los Angeles (AP). Earlier this year, several environmental groups have sent a petition to the Federal Government, seemingly simple news: make sure that the water from the prison colorado is not wasted and it will only be delivered for “reasonably” and “useful” use.
The organization urged the land reclamation office to use its authority to curb water waste in the Lower Pool states: California, Arizona and Nevada. They said it was necessary to help solve river water deficiency.
The concept of reasonable and useful use is not new, but it is discussed at a crucial moment. Chronic excessive use, drought and rising temperatures associated with climate change have reduced water flows. The states dependent on the river are approaching 2026. The deadline to decide on the rules for sharing their new stock, and by mid -November they must reach a preliminary agreement or risk federal intervention.
Petitioning groups claim that the reduction of water waste could help ensure that the river has a sustainable future. However, other anxiety reductions can cause difficulty in farmers and consumers.
The river supports 40 million people in seven US states, two tribes of Mexican states and American Indian.
“We do not currently have the future of the Colorado River management and it becomes quite scary,” said Mark Gold, a lecturer at the University of California, Los Angeles University, and a former director of Water Security Solutions together with the petition group “Nature Resources Defense Council”. “We should deal with this as an emergency of water deficiency, and one of the things you really want to do in an emergency is to first deal with water waste.”
The office did not respond to the petition. In a statement, the Associated Press Agency stated that it continues to operate with existing agreements and rules, and has other strategies to “reduce the risk of reaching critical ups” in river reservoirs, Powell and Mead.
To define “useful” and “reasonable” is not easy
The Bureau Code states that “the presentation of the water of the Colorado River will not exceed those who are reasonably needed for useful use”.
However, Cara Horowitz, Director of UCLA Frank G. Wells Environmental Law Clinic, was not sure what it means or how it applies. So she and her students sought to find out with government records.
“As much as we could say, the phrase has never been defined and it does not use the phrase in any meaningful way because it makes water delivery decisions,” said the Groups representing Horowitz. They believe that the office requires the Reformed process to determine whether the state is avoiding wasted and unjustified use. In the petition, the group urged the office to solve these problems and periodically perform water use reviews.
Experts say the definition of reasonable and useful use can be difficult, but some say it’s worth trying. Others are worried that allowing the power of attorney to determine what is wasted may have a negative impact.
“These are potentially all the tin worms that we need to apply very carefully,” said Kylh Porter, Director of Water Policy at Arizona State University. “Who is the subject who decides what is right for any particular water consumer or community?”
The groups see it differently. For example, they believe that farmers should be encouraged to change the “wasted” irrigation practice and consider growing plants better for a particular climate. An example they provided about the “unreasonable” use all year round the tidal irrigation of thirsty crops in the deserts. In cities and industries, the use of the decorative turf or the use of water requiring cooling systems.
2003 In the case, the office took advantage of the provision when he ordered the reduction of water in the California imperial irrigation area, the largest consumer of the river water, determining that he could not use everything. The district went to court and the dispute eventually resolved.
The concerns of farmers and cities
The California Empire Valley 100% depends on the water of the Colorado River. Deserts in the middle climate, gentle winters are ideal for growing two -thirds of winter vegetables used on a national scale.
Andrew Leimgruber, a fourth -generation farmer here, tried to reduce his use with water -saving programs. It grows crops like carrots, onions and mainly lucerne, which it often floods as it fills the deep root system of the plant. Up to 60 days in the summer, it does not waste it completely.
Water sections may mean that people will not be able to eat cesarean salad in New York in January, Leimgruber said. He is worried about short -term food shortages and farmers’ removal from business.
Bill Hasencamp, the manager of the Colorado River Resources in the Southern California Metropolitan Aquarius, said the agency supports the annual process to ensure that the water is useful, even with the change in this definition, but he does not think it is to resolve the existential crisis of the river. He is worried that this tool can lead to litigation. “When everything goes to court, there is always a wild card that is like anything controlled.”
California’s attitude as a model
Some experts point to the California Constitution as a potential model that provides a provision of reasonable and useful use. As interpreted as smoothly, it is decided by state water regulatory authorities or courts.
“The way it is written is actually very customized by The Times, so it is actually about what is wasted and justified over time,” said Felicia Marcus, a collaborator of the Water in West Stanford University and former California State Water Control Board. “So everything that seemed to be justified 50 years ago is gone.”
For example, the State Water Board used its useful and reasonably used provision, for example, to help maintain less water in cities. This is considered to be a washing sidewalks or car washing in carriage parts. Otherwise, the water agency said and won that it was unwise for the older water rights holder to take so much water that the fish could not swim in the cold water shelter.
The water regulatory authorities also threatened to apply their unreasonable use of power to obtain water rights holders to better control their use. “It’s a tool that is used both in the threat and behind,” Marcus said.
There are several approaches to deal with a shortage
Leimgruber, a Imperial Valley farmer, said he could help limit population growth and development in dry areas. John Boelts, a farmer and president of the Arizona Bureau, offered more florification projects. And Noah Garrison, a UCLA water researcher, found in a recent study, which he co -authored that states could do more to recycle wastewater.
However, since decades of drought are waving parts of the pool and as critical terms approaches, some experts say the time in the office to be stronger.
“There is a responsibility to be a water master on the river or it will be thrown to the Supreme Court, which will take years to pass,” Marcus said. “Petition for useful use is one way to say, ‘Here’s the tool you have, step up and consider.’
___
The Associated Press receives support from the Water and Environmental Policy coverage of the Walton Family Foundation. AP is only responsible for all content. To get all AP environment protection, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-envivinment.