President Trump suggested that, according to his tariff policy, he would consider sending discount checks or tariffs to the Americans funded by the income collected by imported goods. “We have enough money that we are thinking about a small discount on a certain level of income to people,” said a short journalist on Friday at the White House. “The discount of people at a certain level of income can be very pleasant.”
According to the Treasury, the discounts will be derived from a high revenue of the US government rates – more than $ 100 billion in the first 2025. For half a year.
Short notes about these discount checks that can be directed to the Americans “a certain level of income” indicate that they are likely to be checked, but short has offered a little information about the exact income limits or discount sum.
The discounts are reimbursed to Americans who may have faced higher prices due to tariffs and can provide a small economic incentive, which gives Trump’s comments about business “eating rates”, much economic debate about what really creates an account for them.
Any such discount politicians are likely to need Congress confirmation, and lawmakers such as old Josh Hawley have provided support for laws that would provide discounted checks to Americans, but no account or schedule has been specified. If adopted, the administration will need to establish eligibility rules, application or automatic distribution methods and payment logistics. It could be similar to the past stimuli check programs, but at the moment it is only theoretical.
The concept of commemorative is different from the return of legal or administrative rates to importers who have been considered or obliged after judicial decisions doubting the legitimacy of some rates. In such cases, the refund will be awarded to companies that have paid imports, not direct consumers.
Is it legal?
Trump -proposed tariff return vouchers – based on tariff revenue and directly distributed American users – almost certainly demand that Congress legislation be legally justified, given that the US Constitution gives Congress, not the President – not the power to pay the tariffs and the appropriate federal funds.
The President may impose certain rates in accordance with the statutory authorities delegated, but the courts have repeatedly found that the extensive use of these powers in accordance with the International Law on Economic Power (IEEPA) is not legal. Several latest court decisions (including a united US court in international trade judgment) blocked the high rates of Mr Trump, that IEEPA is lacking in legal basis, but the rates are still on appeal and, in theory, the Supreme Court decision.
Short busy July
The proposal of tariff discount checks or refund checks is another new offer of Trump in Liepa, full of them, as Washington, DC, caused a metastatic scandal involving the dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The Trump Department of Justice faces bilateral criticism of the so -called epestein cases, which, according to the Justice Department, does not exist. Wall Street Journal Has announced many cash registers about Trump’s past closeness to the Epstein, including Trump’s name in files.
In July, Trump said it had reached an agreement with Coca-Cola to bring back the true sugar to the Coke formula, which the company partially confirmed in a few days. He also demanded the Washington leaders’ football team to return to the former Redskins name, threatening political obstacles for their stadium project if they did not comply. He announced that he had issued 230,000 cases related to Martin Luther King Jr., and he grew his rage with a federal reservoir and chairman Jerome Powell, visiting the Process Bureau renovations in a hard hat and engaging in a strange, comedic dispute with Powell.
For this story Fate The generative AI is used to help the original draft. The editor checked the accuracy of the information before publishing.
This story was initially displayed by fortuna.com