The Menendes brothers suddenly withdraw to discard La Da’s case; Hearing for resentment set for next week

Updated with more details: The latest presentation between Eric and Lyle Menendes and the District Prosecutor’s Office of Los Angeles County has come down on a main slit.

A surprising move on Friday morning during a hearing at the Van Nuys Court of Justice, California, the lawyer of the Brothers Menendes Mark Geragos withdrew the proposal to remove Dat Nathan Hochman and his entire office from the case. Although more careful than usual with the media before today’s hearing, typically multi -brutal Geragos did not give a detailed reason for Judge Michel Jesich for this move, except to say that he did not want to see the process of resentment, detained more than necessary.

Ever since the deadline

Mark Geragos, lawyer of Eric and Lyle Menendes, arrives at the Van Nuys West Court of Justice on Friday

Mark Geragos, lawyer of Eric and Lyle Menendes, arrives at the Van Nuys West Court of Justice on Friday

In the 1990s in the 1990s, the case of the 1989 rifle murder of the brothers’ parents and sisters returned to the spotlight in any small part due to the success of the Netflix and Ryan Murphy series Monsters: The story of Lyle and Eric Menendes A series and some documentaries that claim new evidence. For this new (ISSH) Evedince, then 18 and 21-year-old Menendes brothers now insist that the shooting of Jose Menendes and Kiti Menendes is self-defense against the ongoing sexual violence by his executive father of the record company.

Later, outside the court after today’s hearing, Geragos said he had downloaded the “strategic reason” proposal that focused on creating a paper trail for the recording as well as resentment. With the refusal of decks, the actual resentment will already be held on May 13 and 14.

It is not known at the moment if the Menendes brothers will testify remotely or not at all.

What is obvious is that hearing for resentment, which will eventually end with the Board of Directors for Conditional Release, is exactly a month before the individual hearing to review on June 13 for each brother before the Conditional Release Council, which Governor Newsom ordered in February. At this point, either the hearing of resentment or review can become controversial.

Earlier on Friday, a middle -aged Lyle Menndez Lyle Menndez has undertaken on social media to mourn the “deer games” of the brothers, hoping to be free, and the direction in which he assumed that the events would continue. “So today is the day that problems will be developed,” he said on Facebook from a state prison near San Diego, where his brother is also housed. “The DA disqualification proposal will be heard and very likely it will be refused. Then in Chambers, the problems associated with the AKR will be solved.”

CRA is a comprehensive risk assessment report commissioned by the State Council of Conditional Exemption earlier this year by governor Gavin Newo as part of his viewing on Menendes.

The partially completed document found itself in the late April in the input of Deputy to Habib Balian, who controls the resentment and aspects of the conditional release of the Hochman case. The presence of the report and the consequences he presented, legally and otherwise threw the grenade into the long delayed hearing on April 17 for the brothers. Jesic Judge closed this hearing in just a few hours and pressed a resolution to this day.

Today, Judge Jesich said he would consider AKR part of any resentment. How much will be played is TBD, as Hochman and Geragos out of court say this morning. In a tone that became common on this issue, the resentment rejecting yes, threw himself at Geragos and his colleague lawyer Brian Friedman for “fake and solid accusations” for unlawful behavior and conflict of interest against him and his service.

The judge also denied the desire of the present to reject the resentment proposal presented by his predecessor George Gaskon. With the line of no, but “still” in the revaluation of Menendes’ verdict, Hochman this spring and last month emphasizes his belief, the brothers are not “clean with … information” after all these decades of “Why are they brutally killing their parents.”

Today’s session comes a week ago after Hochman’s office has stepped down heavily with the movement of refusal in what has become a dog struggle or varieties between the sides to change the life of the brothers and sisters since 1996 without conditional release. “Protection links a conflict of interest to zealous intercession,” the opposition of May 2 announced from the DA service. “In our racing system of justice, countries often disagree that these disagreements are neither new nor incorrect. They are often needed distinguishing features of the search for the racing system of truth.”

Really.

The best of the deadline

Sign up for Deadline newsletter. For the last news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Leave a Comment