Submitted by John Kruzel
Washington (Reuters) -Av Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a case involving a Massachusetts State School teacher who applied to the court for a free word site after her school dismissed her from what she called her revenge on social media reports.
The judges have annulled the appeal of the plaintiff Karrae for a lower court dismissal of her claim for pecuniary damage from Hanover’s state schools and school officials. The Lower Court found that officials and district did not violate the US Constitution’s first amendment against the shortening of the freedom of the Government, as Macrae stated.
Macrae was dismissed in 2021, after school officials discovered fifty social media recordings that she liked, shared, posted or transferred their Tiktok account, which is characterized by “memes” with “homophobia, transphobia and racism.”
According to court, One Meme showed a photo of the transgender woman Rachel Levine, who worked as a US Secretary of Health Secretary at Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration with a text saying: “I am a mental health and food disorder.” … Says an obese man who thinks he is a woman. “Another meme was shown a photo of a muscular, bearded man wearing a sports bra with a text,” Hello, my name is meagan, I’m here at a girl’s meeting. “
Another showed a picture of a panda with a text that reads: “A friend, racism is stupid. I’m black, white and Asian. But everyone loves me,” writes court records.
According to the court’s data, the disputed posts were months before Macrae recruited the school.
Currently, Macrae is the Republican for a place in the Senate of Massachusetts.
Also before recruiting Macrae 2021. Posted a video of “Tike” as a successful position of his school council in another area of the school, in which she said “Critical Race Theory” should not be taught in public schools and that students should not be “trained to choose whether they want to be a girl or boy.”
Macrae was dismissed about a month after the school district hired her as a mathematics and business teacher. School officials said in a Macrae termination letter that “to continue your work in the light of your social media records will have a major adverse effect on pupils’ learning” school.
In his claim, Macrae accused Hanover’s public schools and school officials unlawfully against the first amendment guarded.
The dispute was submitted in 1968. The Supreme Court’s decision involving the first amendments to civil servants. In that case, the court ruled that although civil servants do not lose their right to express themselves on issues of public importance, the employee’s freedom of expression must be considered to keep the Government’s interests in the workplace without a malfunction.
Boston -based Federal Judge, adopted in 2023. The judge also ruled that school officials were entitled to qualified immunity, a legal doctrine, which essentially protects public officials from responsibility.
Boston-based 1st US District Court supported the decision, prompting Macrae’s appeal to the Supreme Court.
Macrae stated that the previous Supreme Court decision should not be applied to her case, as it contained comments made by the employed teacher and that Macrae’s disputed social media posts worked against her in Hanover’s public schools.
Conservative Judge Clarence Thomas wrote on Monday that although he agreed to deprive a court’s decision to deprive Macrae’s appeal, he hopes to make it clear in the future that his opinion that state employers cannot rely on prior court decisions unfair employees who express uncomfortable political opinions. “
(John Kruzel Report; Editing Will Dunham)