The White House is talking loudly about Greenland. But volume should not be confused with madness. This is not a sudden fall into imperial fantasy – it is power politics, simple and unsentimental, dressed in modern language but driven by ancient truths.
Geography still rules destiny. Distance can still protect or endanger nations. The ice is still melting, routes still open, and rivals still moving. Greenland is at the center of it all – a vast swath of territory that dominates the map not by population but by consequence.
Put aside the indignation and pearl-clutching and the case becomes clear. Viewed through a realist lens—the kind John Mearsheimer describes—power is never polite. Nations do not slide through history willingly. They race, maneuver and block rivals wherever they can.
America did not invent this contest, but it has played it for a century, shaping trade routes, blocking strategic choke points and denying rivals the opportunity to expand. Quitting now would not end the game – it would simply lose the advantage.
Greenland matters because the Arctic matters. Melting ice has turned what was once a frozen buffer into a contested corridor. Shipping lanes appear. Submarine cables snake across the ocean floor. Missile paths shorten. Surveillance gaps are narrowing. Russia knows this. China knows this. Both are investing heavily in arctic presence, infrastructure and influence. The US can either treat Greenland as a distant curiosity or as what it really is: an advanced position in a region that will define future balances of power.
This is why the acquisition discussion refuses to die. Under Trump, it has reemerged less out of recklessness than brutality. Say out loud what others have preferred to bury in briefings. Previous administrations whispered the same concerns behind closed doors, then settled for half-measures and cosmetic compromises. Trump simply said the quiet part out loud, with his usual lack of decorum and surplus of disruption. The Allies backed down. But in cold political terms, offense is secondary to advantage.
The preferred path is obvious and needs no justification. Buying Greenland is better than attacking it. A negotiated transfer, with guarantees for the Greenlanders and compensation for Denmark, would be cleaner, cheaper and far less destabilizing than any military move. War in the Arctic would be absurd, costly and counterproductive. Even floating the idea of force is less about intention than about leverage. It’s a reminder that the US is taking the issue seriously, not a rehearsal for invasion.
Critics insist that Greenland’s future is not Washington’s decision. Formally, they are right. Strategically, however, this statement is comforting nonsense. In a world of growing rivalry, no great power allows vital terrain to pass into opposing hands out of courtesy. Sovereignty is sacred until security is threatened; then it becomes negotiable. This is not cynicism, but the hard record of history.
The US bought Louisiana not out of generosity, but to deny France control of the Mississippi. He advocated the Panama break from Colombia to secure a canal that he considered vital. He bought Alaska to keep Russia off its doorstep. Britain took Gibraltar for the same reason: position beats principle when survival is involved. States speak respectfully of borders, until borders threaten them. When security tightens, ideals are revised.
The European reaction, while predictable, is also telling. Europe benefits enormously from American security guarantees, but retreats whenever Washington acts as a power rather than a charity. There is something slightly comical about NATO allies warning the US not to take its own defense too seriously. The alliance is based, after all, on the assumption that America has never been a sentiment-first power. Greenland reveals if he still remembers it.
European nations insist that Greenland is not for sale, while they quietly rely on US troops, money and missiles to keep the peace that allows such a comfortable posture. It’s a bit like lecturing the firemen about property rights while lending them hoses. Principles are easier to defend when someone else pays for the insurance.
The deeper problem is not Trump’s rhetoric, but America’s reluctance to admit what it is. The US remains a global power in a competitive world. It cannot afford strategic blind spots disguised as virtue. Greenland is not a vanity project or a colonial hangover – it is a strategic anchor, a surveillance platform, a logistics hub and a denial asset all rolled into one. Losing influence there wouldn’t cause immediate collapse, but it would mark a significant retreat, amiable rivals notice long before voters do.
That’s why this moment feels different. The language is clearer. Signals are stronger. Force remains the last resort, and rightly so. It is expensive, corrosive and unpredictable. Buying Greenland would cost money and pride, but far less than conflict. Realism does not require hostility. The United States has often secured vital positions without resorting to force.
He gained long-term access to Iceland during World War II because the island mattered more than diplomatic niceties. He maintained his strategic base in Okinawa through negotiations, despite local resistance, because geography demanded it. He turned Diego Garcia into a major military center through negotiation and agreement rather than force. In each case, American security was strengthened without open conflict.
Greenland now deserves the same treatment. Serious discussions that reflect its importance. Give fair payments to Denmark, respect local autonomy, and protect US interests without turning the Arctic into an unnecessary flashpoint. Trump has his eyes on Greenland because the map leaves little room for alternatives.
John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on everyday life.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports and video streaming, go to The Hill.