On Wednesday night, CNN’s Newnight with Abby Phillip segment seemed tense after conservative commentator Scott Jennings insulted a colleague Keith Boykin, a former White House assistant to President Bill Clinton.
During the discussion about the report of the University of Columbia that she had reached an agreement with Trump’s administration on Wednesday to pay more than $ 220 million for the restoration of federal research, Boykin called Jennings for terminating Republican commentators Ana Navarro, who comments on the agreement.
“Do you have to stop each conversation? Do you have to be part of each conversation?” asked Boykin.
“You’re so crying [inaudible]replied Jennings.
“Whiny Why, Scott? Say it, Scott … Say, Scott,” Boykin replied. (See for a moment here.)
Boykin also invited Jennings that he had interrupted him in the conversation before, “You are talking about people who break you, but you do it all the time.”
People in the X, in the former Twitter, killed CNN Pundit polarizing to call Boykin “Whiny” after the segment was shown on TV.
“Why won’t Boykin be able to contact Jennings properly?”, The One X user wrote, calling Jennings’ behavior as an example of microagression.
“The accusation of something else that you are in the middle of your whining is the biggest irony,” wrote another.
Aleksandra Cromer, a ThreeWorks therapist licensed, said the moment in the air told a lot about a tense approach that existed in our current political climate, and the Jennings insult was a “complete interruption of communication.”
“Clinically, if you want to communicate effectively, be clear, objective and direct,” she said, adding: ‘At the time, calling something’ white ‘, eliminating the meaning of their claims and not advertising for further conversations or civil discourse. “
Kromer explained that Jennings called Boykin “Whiny,” Jennings perhaps sought to reduce his power.
“In such a situation, calling something ‘white’ can convey a rejected and sympathetic tone,” Cromer said. “By insulting in any circumstances, you seek to reduce the power of another person and gain more perceived control of the situation.”
Cromer explained that the use of the word “whiny” specifically may have been Jennings attempt to say that what Boykin thinks and feels is “not good enough”.
″[It] During the interview, the concept of a power hierarchy and structure is encouraged when the panel is as correct as possible in the commission’s input options, ”she said.
And Cromer said the direct response of Boykin to Jennings could be “an example of useful disagreements and / or misinterpretation.”
However, she warned that when someone approaches them, he should ensure that they use “clear, direct and objective communication”.
“The way Boykin reacted to Jenkins can also be seen as personalized insult or armed conversation,” she said.
In simple terms, Cromer recommends that people take time to organize their thoughts when they are insulting that “be the most effective self.”
And since it has to do with Jennings, called Boykin “Whiny” during the discussion “network television”, Cromer emphasized that publishing names in any professional environment can be particularly viewed as being “rejected and disrespectful.”
This can report “obvious lack of respect”, as well as perhaps “conscious intolerance of attitudes, opinions and emotional reactions, which are different from your own emotional experience.