Something strange has occurred what we really cannot explain with existing physics

That’s what you will find out after reading this story:

• Is Kaons degraded using a new type of physics? Researchers try to explain their anomalous conclusions.

• Their greater experiment is a continuous study of CP symmetry.

• Anomalies can be measurement noise, new type of particle or new physical force.

---

Scientists suggested A new type of subatomic particle Explain the mysterious disintegration of another particle. Kaon, a special case of meson particle made of one quark and one antique. All are part of the whole family called Hadrones. When Kaon particles break down, very rarely do a few change, causing scientists to excite. Can this at all be explained by existing physics?

Many mesons were found because they themselves There are results in other materials, and in turn they decompose into different particles such as proton types and neutrins. Each meson has a set of possible degradation results, and scientists have only recently started to fully identify and explore the whole possibility. And as scientists invent and adjust better monitoring tools all the time, we live in a very golden age, discovering the results of meson decay.

If this Caon’s decay (de-kon?) Is approved, it is something new in physics. Degrading style can show a whole new particle or new physical force at work to make a new degradation. The idea of ​​”new physics” sounds terrible or guests, depending on your perspective, but in the current explosive age of quantum phenomena and subatomic particles, it is not uncommon for researchers whether what they see before have been heard before.

Kaons has some known common ways to break up, but that This document It is so rare that scientists were not sure that it existed before. Their model predicted fourThis is a true comparison of destiny. What it means to see So much More cases?

“If this is confirmed, this requires physics except the standard model to improve the signal. We examine various new interpretations of the result, including the following: (1) heavy new physics that increases the standard model signal, (2) […] A new light long-term particle or (3) interpretation of the entire signal as the production of new light long-term particles in a fixed target, ”explains the researchers in the document.

In other words, the large number of Fluke’s measurements was a sign that something unusual is happening, and now scientists want to understand and explain why it happened. Yes, the results can be “noise” or simply interference or measurement errors. Our instruments to measure subatomic particles often use secondary information, such as a shadow that is thrown by an object, or how it reflects the light, not the object itself.

Due to its extreme meaninglessness, these secondary data can be unclear. That is why the next step in this study team is the attempt to finally reject the noise. Investigator Kohsaku Tobioka says even this level noise (if so) would be wild. “In this case, the noise faith is very low, so even one event or observation is very bright,” says Tobieka. “There were four in this case.”

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

Get a problem

You may also like it