Los Angeles (AP). On Friday night, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled to support a lower court order, preventing Trump’s administration from being reckless immigration and arrest in southern California.
The Three Judge Chamber of the Ninth US Regional Court held a hearing on Monday afternoon where the federal government asked the court to annul the temporary constraint order on July 12. The judge was adopted by the judge Maamem, stating that this would interfere with their implementation of immigration laws.
Immigrant defense group filed a lawsuit last month, accusing President Donald Trump’s administration systematically directing brown skin people in southern California, through the administration’s coping with illegal immigration. The court’s lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two US citizens as plaintiffs.
At his order, Frimpong stated that there was a “mountain of evidence” that the federal immigration tactics violate the Constitution. She wrote that the Government cannot use factors such as an obvious race or ethnicity, spanish or English with an accent, being in a place such as a towing yard or car wash or someone’s profession as the only basis for reasonable suspicions.
The Los Angeles region was a battlefield with a Trump administration due to its aggressive immigration strategy, which for several weeks prompted protests and deployment of national guards and marines. Federal agents have rounded immigrants who have no legal status to have a US depot, car washes, bus stops and farms, many who live in the country for decades.
Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was demonstrated by a video on June 13. Provided by federal agents when he shouted, “I was born here in the states, East La Bro!”
They want to “send us back to a world where a US citizen … can be grabbed, hidden at the fence and taking his phone and identity from it simply because he worked in the wearing yard in the Latin American neighborhood,” the American Civic Freedom Union lawyer Mohammad Tajsar told the court.
The Federal Government stated that it was not given enough time to collect and submit evidence in the application, given that it was submitted just before July 4. And a court hearing was held next week.
“It is a very serious thing to say that several federal government agencies have a policy of violation of the constitution,” said lawyer Jacob Roth.
He also argued that the order of the Lower Court was too broad and that immigrant supporters did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that the government had official policy to suspend people without reasonable suspicions.
He mentioned the four factors of race, speech, at the site of being and the occupation, which were listed in the temporary restriction procedure, saying that the court should not be able to prohibit the government from using them altogether. He also stated that the order was not clear about what was exactly allowed by law.
“I think legally
The referees had greatly questioned the Government regarding their arguments.
“No one offered that you can’t consider these factors at all,” Judge Jennifer Sung said.
However, these factors alone make up only a “wide profile” and do not satisfy the reasonable standard of suspicion to stop someone, she said.
Sung, a biden, said that in a field like Los Angeles, where Latin Americans make up half of the population, these factors “cannot eradicate those who have a non -document status, and those who document legal status.”
She also asked, “What is the damage that he is told not to do what you think you are not doing?”